↓ Skip to main content

BETASCAN: Probable β-amyloids Identified by Pairwise Probabilistic Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BETASCAN: Probable β-amyloids Identified by Pairwise Probabilistic Analysis
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen W. Bryan, Matthew Menke, Lenore J. Cowen, Susan L. Lindquist, Bonnie Berger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 96 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 25%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Chemistry 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,544,090
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,639
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,979
of 107,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.