The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tests to detect and inform the diagnosis of root caries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013806 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick A Fee, Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 89 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 95 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,767,495
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,650
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,065
of 530,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.