You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Happiness around the world: A combined etic-emic approach across 63 countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0242718 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gwendolyn Gardiner, Daniel Lee, Erica Baranski, David Funder, Members of the International Situations Project |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 18% |
Japan | 3 | 11% |
China | 1 | 4% |
Peru | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
Scientists | 10 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 38 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 23 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 42 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#288,404
of 25,996,988 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,112
of 226,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,130
of 531,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#88
of 2,898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,996,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.