↓ Skip to main content

Altered Brain Activity during Reward Anticipation in Pathological Gambling and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altered Brain Activity during Reward Anticipation in Pathological Gambling and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jung-Seok Choi, Young-Chul Shin, Wi Hoon Jung, Joon Hwan Jang, Do-Hyung Kang, Chi-Hoon Choi, Sam-Wook Choi, Jun-Young Lee, Jae Yeon Hwang, Jun Soo Kwon

Abstract

Pathological gambling (PG) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are conceptualized as a behavioral addiction, with a dependency on repetitive gambling behavior and rewarding effects following compulsive behavior, respectively. However, no neuroimaging studies to date have examined reward circuitry during the anticipation phase of reward in PG compared with in OCD while considering repetitive gambling and compulsion as addictive behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 178 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 18%
Neuroscience 18 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 43 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,695,914
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#78,768
of 193,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,916
of 170,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,396
of 4,261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.