| Title |
Global evidence for ultraviolet radiation decreasing COVID-19 growth rates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2012370118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamma Carleton, Jules Cornetet, Peter Huybers, Kyle C. Meng, Jonathan Proctor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 16% |
| Mexico | 7 | 7% |
| Japan | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 89 | 83% |
| Scientists | 10 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Engineering | 12 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 27% |
| Unknown | 58 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 469. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#58,893
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,483
of 103,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,835
of 529,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#41
of 1,024 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,024 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.