You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Artemisinin Based Therapies for the Treatment and Prevention of Schistosomiasis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0045867 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luis Pérez del Villar, Francisco J. Burguillo, Julio López-Abán, Antonio Muro |
Abstract |
Chemotherapy based on repeated doses of praziquantel is still the most effective control strategy against Schistosomiasis, however artemisinin derivatives emerged as a family of compounds with schistomicide activity. The aim of the present work is to compare the efficacy of artemisinin-based therapies in the treatment and prophylaxis of human schistosomiasis. The design of this work involved a quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 133 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
Researcher | 17 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
Other | 30 | 21% |
Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 7% |
Chemistry | 7 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 19% |
Unknown | 31 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,088,691
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,405
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,577
of 189,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#386
of 4,269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.