| Title |
Corticosteroid use in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03400-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith van Paassen, Jeroen S. Vos, Eva M. Hoekstra, Katinka M. I. Neumann, Pauline C. Boot, Sesmu M. Arbous |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 21 | 16% |
| Spain | 10 | 8% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 65 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 108 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 12% |
| Scientists | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 395 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 11% |
| Researcher | 41 | 10% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 13% |
| Unknown | 152 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 31% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 9% |
| Unknown | 160 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#544,203
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#344
of 6,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,972
of 528,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#15
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.