↓ Skip to main content

Forest Restoration and Fuels Reduction: Convergent or Divergent?

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forest Restoration and Fuels Reduction: Convergent or Divergent?
Published in
BioScience, December 2020
DOI 10.1093/biosci/biaa134
Authors

Scott L Stephens, Mike A Battaglia, Derek J Churchill, Brandon M Collins, Michelle Coppoletta, Chad M Hoffman, Jamie M Lydersen, Malcolm P North, Russell A Parsons, Scott M Ritter, Jens T Stevens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Other 4 13%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#11,255,468
of 17,388,379 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#2,248
of 2,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,747
of 398,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,388,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.