You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Urban Stormwater Runoff: A New Class of Environmental Flow Problem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0045814 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J. Walsh, Tim D. Fletcher, Matthew J. Burns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 489 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 99 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 18% |
| Researcher | 53 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 11% |
| Unknown | 123 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 135 | 27% |
| Engineering | 106 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 4% |
| Design | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 8% |
| Unknown | 158 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,979,510
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#130,893
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,233
of 191,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,082
of 4,264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.