You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating lung cancer risk from chest x-ray and symptoms: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x713993 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen H Bradley, Nathaniel Luke Fielding Hatton, Rehima Aslam, Bobby Bhartia, Matthew EJ Callister, Martyn PT Kennedy, Luke TA Mounce, Bethany Shinkins, William T Hamilton, Richard D Neal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 70% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
| Scientists | 8 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 19% |
| Engineering | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 22 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#911,954
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#412
of 4,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,455
of 518,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#15
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.