You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Case Report: Transoral Penetrating Medullocervical Injury by a Chopstick in Three Cats
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2020
Yukiko Nakano, Yuta Nozue, Kohei Nakata, Toru Fujioka, Yoichi Sakai, Hiroaki Kamishina
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||7||25%|
|Student > Postgraduate||4||14%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||22||79%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
of 6,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 506,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.