↓ Skip to main content

Case Report: Transoral Penetrating Medullocervical Injury by a Chopstick in Three Cats

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case Report: Transoral Penetrating Medullocervical Injury by a Chopstick in Three Cats
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.609869
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukiko Nakano, Yuta Nozue, Kohei Nakata, Toru Fujioka, Yoichi Sakai, Hiroaki Kamishina

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Other 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Lecturer 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 21 72%
Chemistry 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,110,252
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,883
of 8,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,857
of 518,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#151
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.