| Title |
Conductors’ tempo choices shed light over Beethoven’s metronome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0243616 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Almudena Martin-Castro, Iñaki Ucar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 46 | 28% |
| Germany | 6 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 87 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 121 | 74% |
| Scientists | 34 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 32% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#119,661
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,869
of 224,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,447
of 527,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#45
of 2,849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.