| Title |
Conductors’ tempo choices shed light over Beethoven’s metronome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0243616 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Almudena Martin-Castro, Iñaki Ucar |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 47 | 29% |
| Germany | 6 | 4% |
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 86 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 122 | 75% |
| Scientists | 32 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 33% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 297. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#110,703
of 24,493,651 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,733
of 211,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,222
of 515,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#43
of 2,831 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,831 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.