You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of hospital clowns for symptom management in paediatrics: systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m4290 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior, Emiliana Bomfim, Karin Olson, Eliane Tatsch Neves, Denise Sayuri Calheiros Silveira, Michelle Darezzo Rodrigues Nunes, Lucila Castanheira Nascimento, Gabriela Pereira-da-Silva, Regina Aparecida Garcia Lima |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 319 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 66 | 21% |
| United States | 26 | 8% |
| Japan | 17 | 5% |
| France | 12 | 4% |
| Ireland | 11 | 3% |
| Australia | 10 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 130 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 250 | 78% |
| Scientists | 36 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 249 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 106 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 11% |
| Psychology | 17 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 110 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 385. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#81,649
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,331
of 65,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,370
of 529,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#69
of 754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.