↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of early esophageal and gastric cancer - initial experience of a western center

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of early esophageal and gastric cancer - initial experience of a western center
Published in
Clinics, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322010000400005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dalton Marques Chaves, Fauze Maluf Filho, Eduardo G. H. de Moura, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos, Livia Ronise Garcia Arrais, Fabio Kawaguti, Paulo Sakai

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 8%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 23%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 73%
Engineering 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2010.
All research outputs
#5,229,281
of 16,419,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#140
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,383
of 207,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,419,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them