You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and characterization of circadian clock genes in a native tobacco, Nicotiana attenuata
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-12-172 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felipe Yon, Pil-Joon Seo, Jae Yong Ryu, Chung-Mo Park, Ian T Baldwin, Sang-Gyu Kim |
| Abstract |
A plant's endogenous clock (circadian clock) entrains physiological processes to light/dark and temperature cycles. Forward and reverse genetic approaches in Arabidopsis have revealed the mechanisms of the circadian clock and its components in the genome. Similar approaches have been used to characterize conserved clock elements in several plant species. A wild tobacco, Nicotiana attenuata has been studied extensively to understand responses to biotic or abiotic stress in the glasshouse and also in their native habitat. During two decades of field experiment, we observed several diurnal rhythmic traits of N. attenuata in nature. To expand our knowledge of circadian clock function into the entrainment of traits important for ecological processes, we here report three core clock components in N. attenuata. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Nepal | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,465,050
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#2,548
of 3,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,543
of 172,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,283 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.