↓ Skip to main content

Developing and evaluating the implementation of a complex intervention: using mixed methods to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial of an oral healthcare intervention after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing and evaluating the implementation of a complex intervention: using mixed methods to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial of an oral healthcare intervention after stroke
Published in
Trials, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marian C Brady, David J Stott, John Norrie, Campbell Chalmers, Bridget St George, Petrina M Sweeney, Peter Langhorne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 124 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 17 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Professor 8 6%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 22%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2018.
All research outputs
#21,155,664
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#26
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,486
of 130,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.