↓ Skip to main content

Beyond species counts for assessing, valuing, and conserving biodiversity: response to Wallach et al. 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond species counts for assessing, valuing, and conserving biodiversity: response to Wallach et al. 2019
Published in
Conservation Biology, December 2020
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ninon F. V. Meyer, Niko Balkenhol, Trishna Dutta, Maarten Hofman, Jean‐Yves Meyer, Euan G. Ritchie, Charlotte Alley, Chad Beranek, Cassandra K. Bugir, Alex Callen, Simon Clulow, Michael V. Cove, Kaya Klop‐Toker, Omar R. Lopez, Michael Mahony, Robert Scanlon, Sandeep Sharma, Elen Shute, Rose Upton, Emy Guilbault, Andrea S. Griffin, Edwin Hernández Pérez, Lachlan G. Howell, John‐Paul King, Dean Lenga, Patrick O Donoghue, Matt W. Hayward

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Other 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 46%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Linguistics 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,240,823
of 17,413,051 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#838
of 3,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,634
of 394,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#43
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,413,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.