The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Beyond species counts for assessing, valuing, and conserving biodiversity: response to Wallach et al. 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.13665 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ninon F. V. Meyer, Niko Balkenhol, Trishna Dutta, Maarten Hofman, Jean‐Yves Meyer, Euan G. Ritchie, Charlotte Alley, Chad Beranek, Cassandra K. Bugir, Alex Callen, Simon Clulow, Michael V. Cove, Kaya Klop‐Toker, Omar R. Lopez, Michael Mahony, Robert Scanlon, Sandeep Sharma, Elen Shute, Rose Upton, Emy Guilbault, Andrea S. Griffin, Edwin Hernández Pérez, Lachlan G. Howell, John‐Paul King, Dean Lenga, Patrick O Donoghue, Matt W. Hayward |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 10% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| Algeria | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,215,573
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,199
of 4,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,648
of 532,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.