The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Impact of simulation-based teamwork training on COVID-19 distress in healthcare professionals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-020-02427-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Beneria, Mireia Arnedo, Sofia Contreras, Marco Pérez-Carrasco, Itziar Garcia-Ruiz, Mónica Rodríguez-Carballeira, Joaquim Raduà, Jordi Bañeras Rius |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 234 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 21% |
| Unknown | 100 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 12% |
| Psychology | 15 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 100 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,192,508
of 26,380,671 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#292
of 4,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,470
of 534,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#11
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,380,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.