You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Metastasis and Immune Evasion from Extracellular cGAMP HydrolysisENPP1, a Therapeutic Target in Chromosomally Unstable Tumors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Discovery, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0387 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jun Li, Mercedes A. Duran, Ninjit Dhanota, Walid K. Chatila, Sarah E. Bettigole, John Kwon, Roshan K. Sriram, Matthew P. Humphries, Manuel Salto-Tellez, Jacqueline A. James, Matthew G. Hanna, Johannes C. Melms, Sreeram Vallabhaneni, Kevin Litchfield, Ieva Usaite, Dhruva Biswas, Rohan Bareja, Hao Wei Li, Maria Laura Martin, Princesca Dorsaint, Julie-Ann Cavallo, Peng Li, Chantal Pauli, Lee Gottesdiener, Benjamin J. DiPardo, Travis J. Hollmann, Taha Merghoub, Hannah Y. Wen, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Nadeem Riaz, Shin-San Michael Su, Anusha Kalbasi, Neil Vasan, Simon N. Powell, Jedd D. Wolchok, Olivier Elemento, Charles Swanton, Alexander N. Shoushtari, Eileen E. Parkes, Benjamin Izar, Samuel F. Bakhoum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 69 | 39% |
United Kingdom | 17 | 10% |
Germany | 5 | 3% |
Canada | 4 | 2% |
France | 4 | 2% |
Spain | 4 | 2% |
Australia | 3 | 2% |
Singapore | 3 | 2% |
Italy | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Unknown | 53 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 88 | 49% |
Members of the public | 76 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 188 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 16% |
Researcher | 27 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
Other | 30 | 16% |
Unknown | 57 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 6% |
Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 10% |
Unknown | 65 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#137,164
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#53
of 4,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,980
of 529,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#3
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.