↓ Skip to main content

The Speed of Range Shifts in Fragmented Landscapes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Speed of Range Shifts in Fragmented Landscapes
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny A. Hodgson, Chris D. Thomas, Calvin Dytham, Justin M. J. Travis, Stephen J. Cornell

Abstract

Species may be driven extinct by climate change, unless their populations are able to shift fast enough to track regions of suitable climate. Shifting will be faster as the proportion of suitable habitat in the landscape increases. However, it is not known how the spatial arrangement of habitat will affect the speed of range advance, especially when habitat is scarce, as is the case for many specialist species. We develop methods for calculating the speed of advance that are appropriate for highly fragmented, stochastic systems. We reveal that spatial aggregation of habitat tends to reduce the speed of advance throughout a wide range of species parameters: different dispersal distances and dispersal kernel shapes, and high and low extinction probabilities. In contrast, aggregation increases the steady-state proportion of habitat that is occupied (without climate change). Nonetheless, we find that it is possible to achieve both rapid advance and relatively high patch occupancy when the habitat has a "channeled" pattern, resembling corridors or chains of stepping stones. We adapt techniques from electrical circuit theory to predict the rate of advance efficiently for complex, realistic landscape patterns, whereas the rate cannot be predicted by any simple statistic of aggregation or fragmentation. Conservationists are already advocating corridors and stepping stones as important conservation tools under climate change, but they are vaguely defined and have so far lacked a convincing basis in fundamental population biology. Our work shows how to discriminate properties of a landscape's spatial pattern that affect the speed of colonization (including, but not limited to, patterns like corridors and chains of stepping stones), and properties that affect a species' probability of persistence once established. We can therefore point the way to better land use planning approaches, which will provide functional habitat linkages and also maintain local population viability.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 228 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 24%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 15 6%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 45%
Environmental Science 67 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 46 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,782,134
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,607
of 194,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,859
of 175,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#869
of 4,760 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,760 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.