↓ Skip to main content

ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Oncology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1263 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
938 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making
Published in
Annals of Oncology, October 2012
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mds236
Pubmed ID
Authors

H.J. Schmoll, E. Van Cutsem, A. Stein, V. Valentini, B. Glimelius, K. Haustermans, B. Nordlinger, C.J. van de Velde, J. Balmana, J. Regula, I.D. Nagtegaal, R.G. Beets-Tan, D. Arnold, F. Ciardiello, P. Hoff, D. Kerr, C.H. Köhne, R. Labianca, T. Price, W. Scheithauer, A. Sobrero, J. Tabernero, D. Aderka, S. Barroso, G. Bodoky, J.Y. Douillard, H. El Ghazaly, J. Gallardo, A. Garin, R. Glynne-Jones, K. Jordan, A. Meshcheryakov, D. Papamichail, P. Pfeiffer, I. Souglakos, S. Turhal, A. Cervantes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 938 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 6 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Ecuador 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 910 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 140 15%
Other 106 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 11%
Student > Bachelor 98 10%
Student > Master 91 10%
Other 213 23%
Unknown 188 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 468 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 2%
Other 86 9%
Unknown 219 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#2,318
of 7,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,367
of 193,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#39
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.