You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Insight, psychopathology, explanatory models and outcome of schizophrenia in India: a prospective 5-year cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-12-159 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shanthi Johnson, Manoranjitham Sathyaseelan, Helen Charles, Visalakshi Jeyaseelan, Kuruthukulangara Sebastian Jacob |
| Abstract |
The sole focus of models of insight on bio-medical perspectives to the complete exclusion of local, non-medical and cultural constructs mandates review. This study attempted to investigate the impact of insight, psychopathology, explanatory models of illness on outcome of first episode schizophrenia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Egypt | 1 | 10% |
| Kenya | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,599,534
of 24,673,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,871
of 5,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,625
of 178,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#23
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,673,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.