You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine–Based Combinations for Malaria: A Randomised Blinded Trial to Compare Efficacy, Safety and Selection of Resistance in Malawi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001578 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J. Bell, Suzgo K. Nyirongo, Mavuto Mukaka, Ed E. Zijlstra, Christopher V. Plowe, Malcolm E. Molyneux, Steve A. Ward, Peter A. Winstanley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,486,067
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,324
of 195,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,388
of 158,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#159
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.