↓ Skip to main content

Relationships of Cetacea (Artiodactyla) Among Mammals: Increased Taxon Sampling Alters Interpretations of Key Fossils and Character Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
93 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
164 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
462 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationships of Cetacea (Artiodactyla) Among Mammals: Increased Taxon Sampling Alters Interpretations of Key Fossils and Character Evolution
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Spaulding, Maureen A. O'Leary, John Gatesy

Abstract

Integration of diverse data (molecules, fossils) provides the most robust test of the phylogeny of cetaceans. Positioning key fossils is critical for reconstructing the character change from life on land to life in the water.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 3%
Brazil 7 2%
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 426 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 19%
Researcher 70 15%
Student > Master 67 15%
Student > Bachelor 65 14%
Professor 25 5%
Other 81 18%
Unknown 68 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 247 53%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 67 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 5%
Environmental Science 17 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 1%
Other 24 5%
Unknown 80 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#398,437
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,608
of 225,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#848
of 107,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#18
of 516 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 516 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.