↓ Skip to main content

Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Confidence-based Somatic Mutation Evaluation and Prioritization
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Löwer, Bernhard Y. Renard, Jos de Graaf, Meike Wagner, Claudia Paret, Christoph Kneip, Özlem Türeci, Mustafa Diken, Cedrik Britten, Sebastian Kreiter, Michael Koslowski, John C. Castle, Ugur Sahin

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled high throughput discovery of somatic mutations. Detection depends on experimental design, lab platforms, parameters and analysis algorithms. However, NGS-based somatic mutation detection is prone to erroneous calls, with reported validation rates near 54% and congruence between algorithms less than 50%. Here, we developed an algorithm to assign a single statistic, a false discovery rate (FDR), to each somatic mutation identified by NGS. This FDR confidence value accurately discriminates true mutations from erroneous calls. Using sequencing data generated from triplicate exome profiling of C57BL/6 mice and B16-F10 melanoma cells, we used the existing algorithms GATK, SAMtools and SomaticSNiPer to identify somatic mutations. For each identified mutation, our algorithm assigned an FDR. We selected 139 mutations for validation, including 50 somatic mutations assigned a low FDR (high confidence) and 44 mutations assigned a high FDR (low confidence). All of the high confidence somatic mutations validated (50 of 50), none of the 44 low confidence somatic mutations validated, and 15 of 45 mutations with an intermediate FDR validated. Furthermore, the assignment of a single FDR to individual mutations enables statistical comparisons of lab and computation methodologies, including ROC curves and AUC metrics. Using the HiSeq 2000, single end 50 nt reads from replicates generate the highest confidence somatic mutation call set.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Germany 2 2%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 95 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Student > Master 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Computer Science 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,946,232
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,728
of 8,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,698
of 191,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#19
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.