↓ Skip to main content

Continuous Planning: Innovations from Practice in Stavanger (Norway) and Belgrade (Serbia)

Overview of attention for article published in Planning Theory & Practice, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous Planning: Innovations from Practice in Stavanger (Norway) and Belgrade (Serbia)
Published in
Planning Theory & Practice, December 2020
DOI 10.1080/14649357.2020.1849776
Authors

Zlata Vuksanović-Macura, Mirjana Gvozdic, Vladimir Macura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 50%
Arts and Humanities 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,498,865
of 18,815,546 outputs
Outputs from Planning Theory & Practice
#290
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,218
of 433,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planning Theory & Practice
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,815,546 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.