↓ Skip to main content

Fulfilling the Promise of Personalized Medicine? Systematic Review and Field Synopsis of Pharmacogenetic Studies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fulfilling the Promise of Personalized Medicine? Systematic Review and Field Synopsis of Pharmacogenetic Studies
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007960
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael V. Holmes, Tina Shah, Christine Vickery, Liam Smeeth, Aroon D. Hingorani, Juan P. Casas

Abstract

Studies of the genetic basis of drug response could help clarify mechanisms of drug action/metabolism, and facilitate development of genotype-based predictive tests of efficacy or toxicity (pharmacogenetics).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Australia 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 167 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Professor 14 8%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 7%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 30 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,501,593
of 24,635,922 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#87,668
of 212,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,184
of 175,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#245
of 567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,635,922 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.