↓ Skip to main content

Scalpel versus electrosurgery for abdominal incisions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scalpel versus electrosurgery for abdominal incisions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005987.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charoenkwan K, Chotirosniramit N, Rerkasem K, Charoenkwan, Kittipat, Chotirosniramit, Narain, Rerkasem, Kittipan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 14 26%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 74%
Psychology 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 3 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,229,179
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,268
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,622
of 267,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.