You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating the genetic architecture of noncognitive skills using GWAS-by-subtraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-020-00754-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Perline A. Demange, Margherita Malanchini, Travis T. Mallard, Pietro Biroli, Simon R. Cox, Andrew D. Grotzinger, Elliot M. Tucker-Drob, Abdel Abdellaoui, Louise Arseneault, Elsje van Bergen, Dorret I. Boomsma, Avshalom Caspi, David L. Corcoran, Benjamin W. Domingue, Kathleen Mullan Harris, Hill F. Ip, Colter Mitchell, Terrie E. Moffitt, Richie Poulton, Joseph A. Prinz, Karen Sugden, Jasmin Wertz, Benjamin S. Williams, Eveline L. de Zeeuw, Daniel W. Belsky, K. Paige Harden, Michel G. Nivard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 229 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 8% |
| Spain | 10 | 4% |
| Japan | 6 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 122 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 158 | 69% |
| Scientists | 56 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 250 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 18% |
| Researcher | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 76 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 18% |
| Psychology | 34 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 84 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#196,657
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#307
of 7,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,702
of 530,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.