The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How effective was England's teenage pregnancy strategy? A comparative analysis of high-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Science & Medicine, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113685 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J Baxter, Ruth Dundas, Frank Popham, Peter Craig |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 38% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 82 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 86 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,742,590
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#1,820
of 12,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,391
of 530,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#56
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.