↓ Skip to main content

Premature Aging in Skeletal Muscle Lacking Serum Response Factor

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Premature Aging in Skeletal Muscle Lacking Serum Response Factor
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003910
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte Lahoute, Athanassia Sotiropoulos, Marilyne Favier, Isabelle Guillet-Deniau, Claude Charvet, Arnaud Ferry, Gillian Butler-Browne, Daniel Metzger, David Tuil, Dominique Daegelen

Abstract

Aging is associated with a progressive loss of muscle mass, increased adiposity and fibrosis that leads to sarcopenia. At the molecular level, muscle aging is known to alter the expression of a variety of genes but very little is known about the molecular effectors involved. SRF (Serum Response Factor) is a crucial transcription factor for muscle-specific gene expression and for post-natal skeletal muscle growth. To assess its role in adult skeletal muscle physiology, we developed a post-mitotic myofiber-specific and tamoxifen-inducible SRF knockout model. Five months after SRF loss, no obvious muscle phenotype was observed suggesting that SRF is not crucial for myofiber maintenance. However, mutant mice progressively developed IIB myofiber-specific atrophy accompanied by a metabolic switch towards a more oxidative phenotype, muscular lipid accumulation, sarcomere disorganization and fibrosis. After injury, mutant muscles exhibited an altered regeneration process, showing smaller regenerated fibers and persistent fibrosis. All of these features are strongly reminiscent of abnormalities encountered in aging skeletal muscle. Interestingly, we also observed an important age associated decrease in SRF expression in mice and human muscles. Altogether, these results suggest that a naturally occurring SRF down-regulation precedes and contributes to the muscle aging process. Indeed, triggering SRF loss in the muscles of mutant mice results in an accelerated aging process.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 12 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,167,959
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,730
of 193,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,065
of 164,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#410
of 419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.