↓ Skip to main content

The Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046561
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cornelis P. C. de Jager, Peter C. Wever, Eugenie F. A. Gemen, Ron Kusters, Arianne B. van Gageldonk-Lafeber, Tom van der Poll, Robert J. F. Laheij

Abstract

The neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR) has been identified as a predictor of bacteremia in medical emergencies. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of the NLCR in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 264 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 16%
Other 28 10%
Student > Master 26 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 23 9%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 82 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 88 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,111,780
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#72,871
of 193,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,306
of 172,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,280
of 4,536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.