You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Impact of Autonomic Dysfunction on Survival in Patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Parkinson's Disease with Dementia
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0045451 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kajsa Stubendorff, Dag Aarsland, Lennart Minthon, Elisabet Londos |
Abstract |
Autonomic dysfunction is a well-known feature in neurodegenerative dementias, especially common in α-synucleinopathies like dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease with dementia. The most common symptoms are orthostatic hypotension, incontinence and constipation, but its relevance in clinical practice is poorly understood. There are no earlier studies addressing the influence of autonomic dysfunction on clinical course and survival. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of the three most common features of autonomic dysfunction and analyze how it affects survival. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 2 | 22% |
Thailand | 1 | 11% |
Chile | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Other | 27 | 22% |
Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 40% |
Neuroscience | 11 | 9% |
Psychology | 10 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,701,932
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#45,769
of 193,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,920
of 172,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#823
of 4,536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.