↓ Skip to main content

Tag-Trigger-Consolidation: A Model of Early and Late Long-Term-Potentiation and Depression

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tag-Trigger-Consolidation: A Model of Early and Late Long-Term-Potentiation and Depression
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Clopath, Lorric Ziegler, Eleni Vasilaki, Lars Büsing, Wulfram Gerstner

Abstract

Changes in synaptic efficacies need to be long-lasting in order to serve as a substrate for memory. Experimentally, synaptic plasticity exhibits phases covering the induction of long-term potentiation and depression (LTP/LTD) during the early phase of synaptic plasticity, the setting of synaptic tags, a trigger process for protein synthesis, and a slow transition leading to synaptic consolidation during the late phase of synaptic plasticity. We present a mathematical model that describes these different phases of synaptic plasticity. The model explains a large body of experimental data on synaptic tagging and capture, cross-tagging, and the late phases of LTP and LTD. Moreover, the model accounts for the dependence of LTP and LTD induction on voltage and presynaptic stimulation frequency. The stabilization of potentiated synapses during the transition from early to late LTP occurs by protein synthesis dynamics that are shared by groups of synapses. The functional consequence of this shared process is that previously stabilized patterns of strong or weak synapses onto the same postsynaptic neuron are well protected against later changes induced by LTP/LTD protocols at individual synapses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 4%
Switzerland 7 3%
Germany 4 2%
United States 3 1%
France 3 1%
Greece 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 187 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 36%
Researcher 45 20%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 19 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 26%
Neuroscience 44 20%
Computer Science 27 12%
Physics and Astronomy 19 9%
Psychology 15 7%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 26 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,567
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,518
of 183,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#31
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.