↓ Skip to main content

A Statistical Framework for Accurate Taxonomic Assignment of Metagenomic Sequencing Reads

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Statistical Framework for Accurate Taxonomic Assignment of Metagenomic Sequencing Reads
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongmei Jiang, Lingling An, Simon M. Lin, Gang Feng, Yuqing Qiu

Abstract

The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies has greatly promoted the field of metagenomics which studies genetic material recovered directly from an environment. Characterization of genomic composition of a metagenomic sample is essential for understanding the structure of the microbial community. Multiple genomes contained in a metagenomic sample can be identified and quantitated through homology searches of sequence reads with known sequences catalogued in reference databases. Traditionally, reads with multiple genomic hits are assigned to non-specific or high ranks of the taxonomy tree, thereby impacting on accurate estimates of relative abundance of multiple genomes present in a sample. Instead of assigning reads one by one to the taxonomy tree as many existing methods do, we propose a statistical framework to model the identified candidate genomes to which sequence reads have hits. After obtaining the estimated proportion of reads generated by each genome, sequence reads are assigned to the candidate genomes and the taxonomy tree based on the estimated probability by taking into account both sequence alignment scores and estimated genome abundance. The proposed method is comprehensively tested on both simulated datasets and two real datasets. It assigns reads to the low taxonomic ranks very accurately. Our statistical approach of taxonomic assignment of metagenomic reads, TAMER, is implemented in R and available at http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/hji403/MetaR.htm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 8%
France 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Mexico 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 103 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Professor 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 59%
Computer Science 14 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Mathematics 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,111,344
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#96,964
of 218,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,038
of 179,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,376
of 4,543 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,543 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.