You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Do beta-adrenergic blocking agents increase asthma exacerbation? A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-79837-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kuo-Yang Huang, Ping-Tao Tseng, Yi-Cheng Wu, Yu-Kang Tu, Brendon Stubbs, Kuan-Pin Su, Yutaka J. Matsuoka, Chih-Wei Hsu, Ching-Hsiung Lin, Yen-Wen Chen, Pao-Yen Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 9% |
Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,270,010
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#27,552
of 126,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,286
of 504,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,042
of 4,430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.