↓ Skip to main content

CMR of microvascular obstruction and hemorrhage in myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CMR of microvascular obstruction and hemorrhage in myocardial infarction
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-14-68
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine C Wu

Abstract

Microvascular obstruction (MO) or no-reflow phenomenon is an established complication of coronary reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. It is increasingly recognized as a poor prognostic indicator and marker of subsequent adverse LV remodeling. Although MO can be assessed using various imaging modalities including electrocardiography, myocardial contrast echocardiography, nuclear scintigraphy, and coronary angiography, evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is particularly useful in enhancing its detection, diagnosis, and quantification, as well as following its subsequent effects on infarct evolution and healing. MO assessment has become a routine component of the CMR evaluation of acute myocardial infarction and will increasingly play a role in clinical trials of adjunctive reperfusion agents and strategies. This review will summarize the pathophysiology of MO, current CMR approaches to diagnosis, clinical implications, and future directions needed for improving our understanding of this common clinical problem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 168 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 21%
Other 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Student > Master 13 7%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 63%
Engineering 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 43 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,606,041
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#864
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,114
of 192,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.