↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012479.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E Peters, Bhavana Jha, Mark Ross

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,308,316
of 16,657,433 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,806
of 11,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,194
of 276,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,657,433 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.