↓ Skip to main content

Indomethacin for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indomethacin for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013133.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Evans, Deirdre O'Reilly, Jonathan N Flyer, Roger Soll, Souvik Mitra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 16 20%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 21 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#927,557
of 19,102,798 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,290
of 11,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,243
of 377,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,102,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.