You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Bibliographic Assessment Using the Degrees of Publication Method: Medicinal Plants from the Rural Greater Mpigi Region (Uganda)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1155/2021/6661565 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fabien Schultz, Godwin Anywar, Cassandra Leah Quave, Leif-Alexander Garbe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 10% |
Germany | 2 | 10% |
China | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
Scientists | 5 | 24% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Researcher | 3 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 46 | 68% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 44 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,813,378
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#891
of 9,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,754
of 539,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#10
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 539,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.