You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of healthy aging, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease on recollection, familiarity and false recognition, estimated by an associative process-dissociation recognition procedure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychologia, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alfonso Pitarque, Juan C. Meléndez, Alicia Sales, Teresa Mayordomo, Encar Satorres, Joaquín Escudero, Salvador Algarabel |
| Abstract |
Given the uneven experimental results in the literature regarding whether or not familiarity declines with healthy aging and cognitive impairment, we compare four samples (healthy young people, healthy older people, older people with amnestic mild cognitive impairment -aMCI-, and older people with Alzheimer's disease -AD-) on an associative recognition task, which, following the logic of the process-dissociation procedure, allowed us to obtain corrected estimates of recollection, familiarity and false recognition. The results show that familiarity does not decline with healthy aging, but it does with cognitive impairment, whereas false recognition increases with healthy aging, but declines significantly with cognitive impairment. These results support the idea that the deficits detected in recollection, familiarity, or false recognition in older people could be used as early prodromal markers of cognitive impairment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,138,644
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychologia
#614
of 4,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,124
of 370,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychologia
#17
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.