↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Diagnostic performance of a faecal immunochemical test for patients with low-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer in primary care: an evaluation in the South West of England

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 10,584)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
128 news outlets
twitter
32 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic performance of a faecal immunochemical test for patients with low-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer in primary care: an evaluation in the South West of England
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, January 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41416-020-01221-9
Pubmed ID
33462361
Authors

Sarah E. R. Bailey, Gary A. Abel, Alex Atkins, Rachel Byford, Sarah-Jane Davies, Joe Mays, Timothy J. McDonald, Jon Miller, Catherine Neck, John Renninson, Paul Thomas, Fiona M. Walter, Sarah Warren, Willie Hamilton

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Librarian 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 33 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 30%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 34 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1017. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,448
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#4
of 10,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#582
of 504,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.