You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electromagnetic fields, 5G and health: what about the precautionary principle?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978), January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jech-2019-213595 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John William Frank |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 217 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 11 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 5% |
| United States | 9 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 160 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 200 | 92% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 3% |
| Scientists | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 392. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#73,251
of 24,476,221 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#51
of 4,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,228
of 513,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,476,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.