↓ Skip to main content

Physicians' attitudes about obesity and their associations with competency and specialty: A cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 7,846)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physicians' attitudes about obesity and their associations with competency and specialty: A cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-9-106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie Jay, Adina Kalet, Tavinder Ark, Michelle McMacken, Mary Jo Messito, Regina Richter, Sheira Schlair, Scott Sherman, Sondra Zabar, Colleen Gillespie

Abstract

Physicians frequently report negative attitudes about obesity which is thought to affect patient care. However, little is known about how attitudes toward treating obese patients are formed. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of physicians in order to better characterize their attitudes and explore the relationships among attitudes, perceived competency in obesity care, including report of weight loss in patients, and other key physician, training, and practice characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 35%
Psychology 19 14%
Social Sciences 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 245. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#134,387
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#20
of 7,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285
of 112,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.