↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics of the periphery current in Rhode Island Sound

Overview of attention for article published in Ocean Modelling, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamics of the periphery current in Rhode Island Sound
Published in
Ocean Modelling, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.07.001
Authors

Qianqian Liu, Lewis M. Rothstein, Yiyong Luo, David S. Ullman, Daniel L. Codiga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2016.
All research outputs
#9,819,689
of 12,295,032 outputs
Outputs from Ocean Modelling
#287
of 607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,927
of 234,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ocean Modelling
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,295,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.