↓ Skip to main content

Fully Automated 3-D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta, Amniotic Fluid, and Fetus for Early Pregnancy Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fully Automated 3-D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta, Amniotic Fluid, and Fetus for Early Pregnancy Assessment
Published in
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, May 2021
DOI 10.1109/tuffc.2021.3052143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pádraig Looney, Yi Yin, Sally L. Collins, Kypros H. Nicolaides, Walter Plasencia, Malid Molloholli, Stavros Natsis, Gordon N. Stevenson

Abstract

Volumetric placental measurement using 3D ultrasound has proven clinical utility in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, this metric can not currently be employed as part of a screening test due to a lack of robust and real-time segmentation tools. We present a multi-class convolutional neural network (CNN) developed to segment the placenta, amniotic fluid and fetus. The ground truth dataset consisted of 2,093 labelled placental volumes augmented by 300 volumes with placenta, amniotic fluid and fetus annotated. A two pathway, hybrid model using transfer learning, a modified loss function and exponential average weighting was developed and demonstrated the best performance for placental segmentation, achieving a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.84 and 0.38 mm average Hausdorff distance (HDAV). Use of a dual-pathway architecture, improved placental segmentation by 0.03 DSC and reduced HDAV by 0.27mm when compared with a naïve multi-class model. Incorporation of exponential weighting produced a further small improvement in DSC by 0.01 and a reduction of HDAV by 0.44mm. Per volume inference using the FCNN took 7-8 seconds. This method should enable clinically relevant morphometric measurements (such as volume and total surface area) to be automatically generated for the placenta, amniotic fluid and fetus. Ready availability of such metrics makes a population-based screening test for adverse pregnancy outcomes possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 14%
Engineering 3 11%
Mathematics 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 14 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
#2,386
of 2,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,449
of 459,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.