↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Cladribine Administration Increases Amyloid Beta Peptide Generation and Plaque Burden in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic Cladribine Administration Increases Amyloid Beta Peptide Generation and Plaque Burden in Mice
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Crystal D. Hayes, Debleena Dey, Juan Pablo Palavicini, Hongjie Wang, Wataru Araki, Madepalli K. Lakshmana

Abstract

The clinical uses of 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine (2-CDA) or cladribine which was initially prescribed to patients with hematological and lymphoid cancers is now extended to treat patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previous data has shown that 2-CDA has high affinity to the brain and readily passes through the blood brain barrier reaching CSF concentrations 25% of that found in plasma. However, whether long-term administration of 2-CDA can lead to any adverse effects in patients or animal models is not yet clearly known.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2012.
All research outputs
#17,666,399
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,268
of 193,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,661
of 172,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,257
of 4,541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.