You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of hyperlinks in electronic test result communication: a survey study in general practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-114 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Ostersen Mukai, Flemming Bro, Morten Fenger-Grøn, Frede Olesen, Peter Vedsted |
Abstract |
Information is essential in healthcare. Recording, handling and sharing healthcare information is important in order to ensure high quality of delivered healthcare. Information and communication technology (ICT) may be a valuable tool for handling these challenges. One way of enhancing the exchange of information could be to establish a link between patient-specific and general information sent to the general practitioner (GP). The aim of the present paper is to study GPs' use of a hyperlink inserted into electronic test result communication. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
Spain | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
India | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 19% |
Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 27% |
Psychology | 7 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#6,915,042
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#676
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,017
of 172,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#21
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.