You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ander Ramos-Murguialday, Markus Schürholz, Vittorio Caggiano, Moritz Wildgruber, Andrea Caria, Eva Maria Hammer, Sebastian Halder, Niels Birbaumer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 334 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 18% |
| Researcher | 50 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 106 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 39 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 15% |
| Unknown | 73 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2012.
All research outputs
#6,199,151
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#74,105
of 193,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,352
of 172,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,307
of 4,537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.