You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
日本の豪華客船のデザインに対する私の体験と提唱 (<特集>客船とインテリア)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, Japan, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.14856/ran.1.0_23 |
| Authors |
樋口 治 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,145,365
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, Japan
#1
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,004
of 453,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, Japan
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.